These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Attempt to improve transcutaneous bilirubinometry: a double-blind study of Medick BiliMed versus Respironics BiliCheck.
    Author: De Luca D, Zecca E, Corsello M, Tiberi E, Semeraro C, Romagnoli C.
    Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2008 Mar; 93(2):F135-9. PubMed ID: 18006568.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To compare the accuracy of a new transcutaneous bilirubinometer, BiliMed (Medick SA, Paris, France) with BiliCheck (Respironics, Marietta, GA, USA), a widely available instrument, and with total serum bilirubin measurement. DESIGN: A prospective double-blind study comparing the two devices was carried out. 686 healthy newborns needing measurement of their bilirubin were enrolled over a 4-month period. Serum and transcutaneous bilirubin measurements were taken with both devices within 15 minutes. The order of use of the instruments was randomised. SETTING: Well-baby nursery ward in a university hospital, tertiary referral centre. RESULTS: The linear regression analysis showed a better correlation between BiliCheck and serum bilirubin (r = 0.75) than between BiliMed and serum bilirubin (r = 0.45). BiliCheck variability (+/-2 SD of the mean bias from serum bilirubin) was within -87.2 to 63.3 micromol/l, while BiliMed variability was within -97.5 to 121.4 micromol/l. The receiver operating characteristic analysis (for serum bilirubin levels >205.2 micromol/l or >239.4 micromol/l) showed significantly higher areas under the curve for BiliCheck than those for BiliMed (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the potential practical advantages of BiliMed, its reduced diagnostic accuracy in comparison with BiliCheck does not justify its use in clinical practice.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]