These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Effect of 4% titanium tetrafluoride solution on dental erosion by a soft drink: an in situ/ex vivo study. Author: Magalhães AC, Rios D, Honório HM, Jorge AM, Delbem AC, Buzalaf MA. Journal: Arch Oral Biol; 2008 May; 53(5):399-404. PubMed ID: 18076864. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: This in situ/ex vivo study assessed the effect of titanium tetrafluoride (TiF(4)) on permanent human enamel subjected to erosion. DESIGN: Ten volunteers took part in this study performed in two phases. In the first phase (ERO), they wore acrylic palatal appliances containing two enamel blocks, divided into two rows: TiF(4) (F) and no-TiF(4) (no-F). During the 1st day, the formation of a salivary pellicle was allowed. In the 2nd day, the TiF(4) solution was applied on one row (ERO+F), whereas on the other row no treatment was performed (ERO+no-F). From 3rd until 7th day, the blocks were subjected to erosion, 4x per day. In the 2nd phase (no-ERO), the volunteers wore acrylic palatal appliances containing one enamel block, during 2 days, to assess the effect of TiF(4) only (no-ERO+F). Enamel alterations were determined using profilometry (wear), microhardness (%SMHC) tests, scanning electron microscope and microprobe analysis. The %SMHC and wear were tested using ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests (p<0.05). RESULTS: The mean of %SMHC and wear (microm) values (+/-S.D.) were, respectively: ERO+F -73.32+/-5.16(A)/2.40+/-0.60(a); ERO+no-F -83.49+/-4.59(B)/1.17+/-0.48(b) and no-ERO+F -67.92+/-6.16(A)/0.21+/-0.09(c). In microscope analysis, the no-F group showed enamel with honeycomb appearance. For F groups, it was observed a surface coating with microcracks. The microprobe analysis revealed the presence of the following elements (%) in groups ERO+F, ERO+no-F and no-ERO+F, respectively: Ca (69.9, 72.5, 66.25); P (25.9, 26.5, 26.06); Ti (3.0, 0, 5.93). CONCLUSIONS: The TiF(4) was unable to reduce dental erosion.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]