These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The 20-core prostate biopsy protocol--a new gold standard?
    Author: Ravery V, Dominique S, Panhard X, Toublanc M, Boccon-Gibod L, Boccon-Gibod L.
    Journal: J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):504-7. PubMed ID: 18076947.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: We investigated the ability of a 20-core prostate biopsy protocol to enhance the prostate cancer diagnosis rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the diagnosis rate of prostate biopsies in 2 groups of consecutive patients, including group 1-10 cores and group 2-20 cores. The prostate specific antigen range in the 2 groups was 3 to 30 ng/ml and biopsies were performed because of increased prostate specific antigen (more than 3 ng/ml) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination. To analyze the results we divided each group into 3 subgroups according to prostate specific antigen, including group 1-3 to less than 6 ng/ml, group 2-6 or greater to less than 10 ng/ml and group 3-10 or greater to up to 30 ng/ml. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the difference in the diagnosis rate among the subgroups according to the number of cores taken. RESULTS: The percent of positive biopsies was 39.7% in group 1 and 51.7% in group 2. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the number of biopsies taken was a factor that independently and significantly correlated with the prostate cancer diagnosis. The 20-core biopsy protocol was more efficient than the 10-core protocol in the 3 subgroups with 47.2% vs 28.1% of patients diagnosed in group 1 (OR 3.26, p = 0.001), 40.5% vs 36.1% in group 2 (OR 2.37, p = 0.009) and 69.8% vs 39.7% in group 3 (OR 2.01, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: The 20-core biopsy protocol was more efficient than the 10-core biopsy protocol, especially in patients with prostate specific antigen between 3 and 6 ng/ml. Nevertheless, it is mandatory to confirm whether detected tumors are clinically significant on pathological examination of the radical prostatectomy specimens.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]