These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Functional advantage of articulating versus static spacers in 2-stage revision for total knee arthroplasty infection.
    Author: Freeman MG, Fehring TK, Odum SM, Fehring K, Griffin WL, Mason JB.
    Journal: J Arthroplasty; 2007 Dec; 22(8):1116-21. PubMed ID: 18078879.
    Abstract:
    Infection is an unfortunate complication of total knee arthroplasty. Current literature supports 2-stage reimplantation as the gold standard. Controversy exists whether static or articulating spacers are the best interim treatment method. Seventy-six 2-stage reimplantation procedures met the study inclusion criteria. There were 28 static spacers and 48 articulating spacers. The eradication rate was 94.7% in the articulating group compared with 92.1% in the static group (P = 0.7). There were no significant differences in postoperative Knee Society Scores pain scores. There were 28 (58%) good to excellent function scores in the articulating group and 10 (36%) in the static group (P = .05). Interim use of an articulating spacer maintains excellent infection eradication rates and may improve function over the use of static spacers.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]