These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Chemometric analysis of diesel fuel for forensic and environmental applications.
    Author: Hupp AM, Marshall LJ, Campbell DI, Smith RW, McGuffin VL.
    Journal: Anal Chim Acta; 2008 Jan 14; 606(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 18082647.
    Abstract:
    Diesel fuel samples were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and chemometric procedures to associate and discriminate samples for potential use in forensic and environmental applications. Twenty-five diesel samples, representing 13 different brands, were collected from service stations in the Lansing, Michigan area. From the GC-MS data, mass-to-charge ratios were identified to represent aliphatic (m/z 57) and aromatic (m/z 91 and 141) compounds. The total ion chromatogram (TIC) and extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) of the chosen ions were evaluated using Pearson product moment correlation (PPMC) and principal component analysis (PCA). Diesel samples from the same brand showed higher PPMC coefficients, while those from different brands showed lower values. EICs generally provided a wider range of correlation coefficients than the TIC, with correspondingly increased discrimination among samples for EIC m/z 91. PCA grouped the diesel samples into four distinct clusters for the TIC. The first cluster consisted of four samples from the same brand, two clusters contained one diesel sample each of different brands, and the fourth cluster contained the remaining diesel samples. The same trend was observed using each EIC, with an increase in the number of clusters formed for EIC m/z 57 and 91. Both statistical procedures suggest aromatic components (specifically, those with m/z 91) provide the greatest discrimination among diesel samples. This conclusion was supported by identifying the chemical components that contribute the most to the variance. The relative amount of aliphatic versus aromatic components was found to cause the greatest discrimination among samples in the data set.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]