These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The association of simple anterior dental crossbite to gingival margin discrepancy.
    Author: Harrison RL, Leggott PJ, Kennedy DB, Lowe AA, Robertson PB.
    Journal: Pediatr Dent; 1991; 13(5):296-300. PubMed ID: 1815202.
    Abstract:
    The purpose of this study was to determine the severity of gingival margin discrepancy affecting the mandibular incisors in children with a single-tooth anterior crossbite. The response of the position of the gingival margin to correction of the crossbite also was investigated. Twenty-two subjects with a single central crossbite and 16 subjects with a single lateral crossbite were identified from two orthodontic practices. Seventeen of the 22 central incisor patients had immediate posttreatment records available; six patients had long-term follow-up records. An insufficient number of posttreatment records were available for the patients with lateral crossbites. The mean clinical crown length of crossbite mandibular incisors, measured on the study models, was compared with mean crown length of contralateral control incisors and the difference in clinical crown length was determined. A gingival margin discrepancy was identified when the gingival margin of the crossbite incisor was at least 1.0 mm apical to the gingival margin of the control incisor. The proportion of subjects with gingival margin discrepancy was significantly higher in subjects with central incisor crossbite (12/22 = 54%) than in those with lateral incisor crossbite (4/16 = 25%), P less than 0.05. While a gingival margin discrepancy persisted for eight of the 17 central incisor crossbites after discontinuing the appliance, 8.9 +/- 4.7 months, the severity of the discrepancy showed a significant reduction from 2.2 +/- 0.5 mm to 1.3 +/- 0.8 mm, P less than 0.05. True recession with exposure of cementum was not observed in any subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]