These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of incremental spinal anesthesia using a 32-gauge catheter with extradural anaesthesia for elective caesarean section.
    Author: Kestin IG, Madden AP, Mulvein JT, Goodman NW.
    Journal: Br J Anaesth; 1991 Feb; 66(2):232-6. PubMed ID: 1817627.
    Abstract:
    Forty-three mothers who had requested regional anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section were allocated randomly to receive either extradural anaesthesia with pH-adjusted 2% lignocaine with 1/200,000 adrenaline, or incremental spinal anaesthesia using a 32-gauge catheter with 0.5% plain bupivacaine. Increments of lignocaine or bupivacaine were given with the aim of achieving a block from T4 to S5. The spinal catheter was quicker to place (median 3 min, range 1-45 min, compared with median 10 min, range 1.5-50 min) and spinal anaesthesia was quicker to establish (median 20 min, range 10-46 min compared with median 48 min, range 15-59 min) compared with the extradural technique. The maximum height of the spinal block was significantly higher (median T3-4, range T5-T3) than the extradural group (median T5, range T6-T3). The total dose of intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine was unpredictable, with a mean dose of 2.7 ml and a range between 1.5 ml and 7.4 ml. Haemodynamic stability and the quality of the block were similar between the groups. There were two mild spinal-headaches in the spinal group. All the spinal catheters were removed intact.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]