These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Use of the percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with severe refractory cardiogenic shock as a bridge to long-term left ventricular assist device implantation.
    Author: Idelchik GM, Simpson L, Civitello AB, Loyalka P, Gregoric ID, Delgado R, Kar B.
    Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant; 2008 Jan; 27(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 18187095.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: For patients with persistent cardiogenic shock refractory to intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) support, there are only limited means of resuscitation and bridging to surgical left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and emergency surgical approaches have been attempted but are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device (PVAD) as a bridge to LVAD implantation in patients in cardiogenic shock refractory to IABP and pressor support. METHODS: Between May 2003 and April 2006, at our institution, 18 patients in severe refractory cardiogenic shock received a PVAD as a bridge to LVAD placement or orthotopic heart transplantation. Six patients had ischemic cardiomyopathy, and 12 had nonischemic cardiomyopathy. At the time of PVAD placement, 17 were receiving IABP support, and 10 were undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. RESULTS: The mean duration of PVAD support was 4.2 +/- 2.5 days. During this time, the cardiac index improved from 0.86 +/- 0.66 to 2.50 +/- 0.93 liters/min/m2 (p < 0.001), systolic blood pressure improved from 72 +/- 11 to 98 +/- 15 mm Hg (p = 0.001), and systemic mixed venous oxygenation improved from 37 +/- 7 to 62 +/- 6 mm Hg (p < 0.001). We terminated life support in 4 of the 18 patients before LVAD placement; 14 were successfully bridged to LVAD or heart transplantation. The mortality rate was 27% at 30 days and 33% at 6 months. There were no PVAD-associated deaths. CONCLUSION: In patients with terminal hemodynamic collapse, PVAD support is an effective bridging therapy to LVAD and appears to be a viable alternative to other invasive methods of support.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]