These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Localization of ectopic ventricular depolarization by ISPECT-radionuclide ventriculography and by magnetocardiography. ISPECT and MCG for ectopic mapping.
    Author: Hombach V, Kochs M, Weismüller P, Clausen M, Henze E, Richter P, Höher M, Peper A, Eggeling T, Adam WE.
    Journal: Int J Card Imaging; 1991; 7(3-4):225-35. PubMed ID: 1820403.
    Abstract:
    Since catheter or surgical techniques for ablating the arrhythmogenic substrate in patients with SVT due to accessory pathways or those with VT are now available, exact localization of the substrate is mandatory. We report preliminary results of two new non-invasive techniques for localizing either the site of earliest ventricular contraction using ISPECT, or the site of initial ventricular depolarization by magnetocardiography (MCG) in WPW syndrome and in VT patients. Thirteen patients with WPW syndrome and 8 patients with sustained VTs were studied with ISPECT. In 9/13, comparative catheter mapping data were available. Two patients had two Kent bundles. 13/15 Kent bundles could be localized by ISPECT. In 5/9 patients the area of Kent bundle insertion was identical with ISPECT and catheter mapping, in 3 correlation was fair, and in 2 patients with 2 Kent bundles ISPECT failed to localize their insertion. In 3/8 patients with VT catheter mapping could not be performed for hemodynamic reasons. In 2/5 patients the area of VT focus was identical with both methods, in one patient it was adjacent to each other, and in 2/5 patients a larger anatomic distance of the focus was found with both methods. In 3/7 patients with WPW the MCG showed the site of Kent bundle insertion, which was identical to that seen by catheter mapping. In one patient the area was adjacent, and in 3 more distant from the site determined by catheter mapping. In 1/2 patients with 2 Kent bundles, one of these could be detected by MCG. In 1/3 patients with VT, the site of VT focus was identical with both methods, but in the remaining two a distance of 3-4 cm was observed between the area seen with MCG and that with catheter mapping. In 4 further VT patients with stable and uniform ventricular late potentials, ventricular late magnetic activity was found with different QRS lengths within the single MCG channels. From our results we conclude that both ISPECT and MCG seem to become very promising non-invasive techniques for localizing ectopic ventricular depolarization in WPW syndrome and VT patients. However, these methods have to be refined, improved and validated by further systematical studies.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]