These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Response to novelty predicts the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to cocaine.
    Author: Hooks MS, Jones GH, Smith AD, Neill DB, Justice JB.
    Journal: Synapse; 1991 Oct; 9(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 1821483.
    Abstract:
    The relationship between a rat's locomotor response to a novel environment and its behavioral and dopaminergic responses to cocaine was examined. Subjects were divided into two groups based on their locomotor response to a novel environment. Subjects who had a novelty response above the median were classified as high responders (HR), while those with a novelty response below the median were classified as low responders (LR). Following administration of cocaine-HCl (0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, or 15.0 mg/kg), HR rats showed a greater locomotor response than LR rats. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between a subject's locomotor response to the novel environment and the locomotor response to either 10.0 (r = 0.65) or 15.0 (r = 0.92) mg/kg cocaine. In a separate experiment, the extracellular concentration of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens (NACC) was monitored using microdialysis procedures. Following cocaine administration (15.0 mg/kg) HR rats showed a larger NACC dopamine response and greater locomotor activity than LR rats. In addition, there was a threefold greater locomotor activity to dopamine ratio in HR rats than in LR rats. A correlation between a subject's locomotor response to a novel environment and the dopaminergic response to cocaine was also evident. These results suggest that differences in the locomotor response to cocaine can, to some degree, be predicted by a rat's locomotor response to a novel environment, and that variations in dopamine-dependent mechanisms of the NACC may underlie these individual differences.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]