These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Clinical comparison of flowable composite to other fissure sealing materials--a 12 months study.
    Author: Dukić W, Dukić OL, Milardović S, Vindakijević Z.
    Journal: Coll Antropol; 2007 Dec; 31(4):1019-24. PubMed ID: 18217452.
    Abstract:
    The subject of the study was the clinical analysis of six different sealing materials over a 12-months period. It was necessary to prove the clinical success of sealing with flowable composite with the use of adhesive system and preventing effect of sealants on caries developement. Our study included children aged from 6 to 15, and we sealed 326 teeth with materials from the group of flowable composites in combination with adhesive system (Admira Bond+Admira Flow, Excite+Tetric Flow) and other sealing resins (Teethmate F1, Admira Seal, Helioseal Clear Chroma, Fissurit FX). Over a 12-months period, the total retention was 83.3% (Tetric Flow), 81.5% (Admira Seal), 81.5% (Fissurit FX), 76.4% (Teethmate F1), 75.9% (Helioseal Clear Chroma) and 74.6% (Admira Flow). Only 5 molars (1.5%) developed clinical caries, so fissure sealing has showed to be an excelent prevention of occlusal caries. Flowable composites used with adhesive system are equal to other sealing materials. Sealing materials show great and durable preventive effect against caries development in the fissure system. Since there are many different sealing materials, adhesives, flowable composites on the market and many different pretreatments of the enamel, future studies are necessary and should have an aim to investigate the best technique and material for fissure sealing.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]