These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Endoscopic submucosal dissection of recurrent or residual superficial esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy. Author: Saito Y, Takisawa H, Suzuki H, Takizawa K, Yokoi C, Nonaka S, Matsuda T, Nakanishi Y, Kato K. Journal: Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Feb; 67(2):355-9. PubMed ID: 18226703. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Treatment of local recurrent or residual superficial esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) with conventional EMR often results in a piecemeal resection that requires further intervention. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). DESIGN: A case series. PATIENTS: Between January 2006 and September 2006, 4 local recurrent or residual superficial esophageal SCCs were treated by ESD. INTERVENTIONS: ESD procedures were performed by using a bipolar needle knife and an insulation-tipped knife. After injection of glycerol into the submucosal (sm) layer, a circumferential incision was made, and an sm dissection was performed. All lesions were determined to be intramucosal or sm superficial, without lymph-node metastasis by EUS before treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Tumor size, en bloc resection rate, tumor-free lateral margin rates, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: All 4 ESD cases were successfully resected en bloc, and the tumor-free lateral margin rate was 75% (3/4) by histopathology examination. The mean tumor size of the resected specimens was 35 mm (range, 15-50 mm). There were no complications. LIMITATIONS: The number of ESDs in our series was limited, and there are no long-term follow-up data. CONCLUSIONS: ESD for recurrent or residual superficial esophageal tumors after chemoradiotherapy achieves the goal of an en bloc resection, with a low rate of incomplete treatment without any greater risk than the EMR technique.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]