These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs closed diathermy-excision hemorrhoidectomy without suture-ligation: a case-controlled trial.
    Author: Araujo SE, de Caravatto PP, Dumarco RB, Sousa M.
    Journal: Hepatogastroenterology; 2007 Dec; 54(80):2243-8. PubMed ID: 18265642.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND/AIMS: We compared stapled hemorrhoidectomy to closed diathermy-excision hemorrhoidectomy without suture-ligation regarding postoperative pain, complications and long-term efficacy. METHODOLOGY: A series of 108 patients had indication for stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Patients who underwent stapled hemorrhoidectomy (76) were compared to patients submitted to closed diathermy-excision hemorrhoidectomy (32) due to non-insurance cover. Primary endpoints were postoperative pain, complications, and clinical results after one year. Patients completed a 10-cm visual analog pain scale postoperatively and fulfilled a questionnaire before and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: After seven days, median and maximum daily pain scores were lower in the stapled group (P < 0.001). Resumption of activities occurred after 9 days (mean; range 2 to 17 days) after stapling and 14 days (7 to 24) after diathermy surgery - P < 0.001. There was no difference regarding complications during the follow-up. After one year, 45 (80.4%) patients in the stapled group and 18 (78.3%) in the diathermy group were asymptomatic (P = 1.000). After one year, none of the patients needed a second operation and there was no fecal incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy selectively indicated is less painful, not associated to greater morbidity and has the same long-term efficacy when compared to closed diathermy excision without suture-ligation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]