These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Refinement of CARTO-guided substrate modification in patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction.
    Author: Li YG, Wang QS, Grönefeld G, Israel C, Lu SB, Shao Y, Ehrlich JR, Hohnloser SH.
    Journal: Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Jan 20; 121(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 18272037.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Substrate modification guided by CARTO system has been introduced to facilitate linear ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) after myocardial infarction (MI). However, there is no commonly accepted standard approach available for drawing these ablation lines. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to practically refine this time consuming procedure. METHODS: Substrate modification was performed in 23 consecutive patients with frequent VTs after MI using the CARTO system. The initial target site (ITS) for ablation was identified by pace mapping (PM) during sinus rhythm and/or entrainment pacing (EM) during VT. According to the initial target site, two approaches were used. The initial target site in approach one has a similar QRS morphology as VT and an interval from the stimulus to the onset of QRS complex (S-QRS) of = 50 ms during PM in sinus rhythm or a difference of the post pacing interval and VT cycle length = 30 ms during concealed entrainment pacing of VT; The initial target site in approach two has an similar QRS morphology as VT and an S-QRS of < 50 ms during PM in sinus rhythm. RESULTS: Overall, 50 lines were performed with a length of (35 +/- 11) mm. Procedure time averaged (232 +/- 56) minutes, fluoroscopy time (10 +/- 8) minutes. Sixteen patients were initially involved into approach one. After completion of 3 +/- 1 ablation lines, no further VT was inducible in 13 patients. The remaining 3 patients were switched to use the alternative approach. However, in none of them the alternative approaches were successful. Approach two was initially used in 7 patients. After completion of 3 +/- 1 ablation lines, no further VT was inducible in only 2 patients. The remaining 5 patients were switched to approach one, which resulted in noninducibility of VT in 4 of them. The initial successful rate was significantly higher in the group of approach one compared to that in the group of approach two (13/16 patients vs 2/7 patients, P = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: The approach for substrate modification of VT after MI can be optimized by identifying the appropriate initial target site with specific characteristics within the zone of slow conduction. The refined approach may facilitate linear ablation of VT, and further reduce the procedure and fluoroscopy time.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]