These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Teicoplanin monotherapy of serious infections caused by gram-positive bacteria: a re-evaluation of patients with endocarditis or Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia from a European open trial.
    Author: Davey PG, Williams AH.
    Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother; 1991 Apr; 27 Suppl B():43-50. PubMed ID: 1829076.
    Abstract:
    We have examined case records for patients who received teicoplanin alone for endocarditis or Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. All patients with streptococcal endocarditis were cured (viridans group 14/14; Group D 4/4). Cure rates for other organisms were: Enterococcus faecalis 3/5; S. aureus 5/10 and coagulase negative staphylococci 2/3. Doses for six patients who failed because of poor response were 3.3-4.2 mg/kg. Teicoplanin treatment cured 41/48 patients with S. aureus bacteraemia; treatment failed in two patients because of adverse events. Doses in the remaining treatment failures were 2.1-5.0 mg/kg. In comparison, 48 patients in Dundee hospitals received ten different drugs in 20 combinations for S. aureus bacteraemia; 29 patients received cloxacillin or flucloxacillin but initial doses varied from 0.25-2.0 g. We conclude that the European database does provide evidence that teicoplanin monotherapy is effective for serious infection with Gram-positive bacteria. Doses for staphylococcal infection should probably be at least 6 mg/kg. The upper limit of the teicoplanin dosage range remains to be determined but there is evidently considerable confusion about appropriate regimens for 'standard' therapy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]