These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Introduction: the clinical challenge.
    Author: Schmoll HJ.
    Journal: Eur J Cancer; 1991; 27 Suppl 1():S1-2. PubMed ID: 1831627.
    Abstract:
    In summary, ondansetron has proved to be a highly effective anti-emetric and is superior to metoclopramide in the treatment of acute emesis. The results in delayed emesis are less consistent, with superiority demonstrated in both non-cisplatin and radiotherapy studies, but rather equivocal results in cisplatin studies to date. Ondansetron exhibits minimal toxicity with no reported acute dystonic effects. This clearly is an obvious benefit - particularly in young patients. In three of the trials there was a crossover design which generated patient preference data (Table 5). Nausea and vomiting are very distressing but not life-threatening side effects; they are side effects to be tolerated by patients embarking on potentially curative chemotherapy. In the final analysis, patient preferences for a specific anti-emetic may well be one of the most important parameters by which a new anti-emetic should be judged. Since the London symposium, ondansetron has been introduced in the UK and New Zealand (Trademark ZOFRAN) and France (Trademark ZOPHREN). The objective of a satellite symposium to the 15th International Cancer Congress, Hamburg, held in August 1990, was to review new studies involving ondansetron and evaluate the clinical performance in a database of more than 5,500 cancer patients, including a significant paediatric contribution.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]