These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: An evidence-based evaluation of tracheostomy care practices.
    Author: Dennis-Rouse MD, Davidson JE.
    Journal: Crit Care Nurs Q; 2008; 31(2):150-60. PubMed ID: 18360145.
    Abstract:
    Adverse outcomes related to tracheal occlusion and peritracheal skin breakdown stimulated a review of tracheostomy care. An evidence-based practice approach was taken to evaluate the problem. Organizational tracheostomy care policies were reviewed. Subcategories related to tracheostomy care were queried including securing devices, sutures and their removal, type and choice of dressings, prevention of skin breakdown, frequency of care and role delineation, and suctioning. A literature review was done. National experts were surveyed. A geographical survey was taken and vendors of tracheostomy products were interviewed. Collected evidence was scored along a continuum. Costs of supplies were evaluated. Physicians, staff, and patients were interviewed. Skin maceration on the neck was found on multiple audits. The type of tie was identified as a problem. Nurses and respiratory therapists reported difficulty providing tracheostomy care due to suturing technique and securing methods. The stocked dressing was too large to fit under sutures. Several conflicting policies existed regarding tracheostomy care, none of which identified responsibility for performing care: respiratory versus nursing or time standards for care. New supplies were trialed. A list of practice changes were agreed upon by respiratory, nursing, and medical staff. Primary responsibility for tracheostomy care was shifted to the registered nurse.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]