These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Seroprevalence of tetanus antibody in the Thai population: a national survey.
    Author: Chatchatee P, Chatproedprai S, Warinsathien P, Tharmaphornpilas P, Yoocharoen P, Warintrawat S, Theamboonlers A, Chongsrisawat V, Poovorawan Y.
    Journal: Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 2007 Dec; 25(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 18402295.
    Abstract:
    Tetanus is a disease with high mortality and the most important measure for effective prevention is vaccination. Tetanus immunization has been introduced to Thailand's national immunization program for 30 years. Yet, the coverage and seroprevalence of tetanus antibody in vast parts of the population has not been assessed. This study has been performed on 1,277 subjects aged between 6 months and 60 years or above from four geographically distinct provinces of Thailand. Tetanus antibody levels were measured using a commercially available ELISA kit. Most of the Thai population had immunity against tetanus. The level of antibodies to tetanus, as demonstrated by the geometric mean titer of antibody (GMT) (and 95% confidence interval) was 2.62 (2.34-2.91) IU/ml. The highest and lowest GMT was found in subjects aged between 5 and 9 years, and above 60 years of age with GMT (and 95% confidence intervals) of 3.64 (3.34-3.96) and 1.24 (0.67-2.29) IU/ml respectively. The minimum protective level of antitoxin (>0.01 IU/ml) was detected in 99.7 % of subjects. More than 90% of subjects displayed durable antibody protection levels (DAPL) (> or = 1.0 IU/ml), except for subjects above the age of 60 years (82%). According to this study, the majority of the population expresses tetanus antibody levels that can confer long term protection. Yet, considering the lowest GMT and the highest incidence of tetanus cases found in subjects aged above 60 years, re-immunization should be targeted at this age group especially if they had sustained any tetanus-prone injury.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]