These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Reliability of mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during isometric step and ramp muscle actions.
    Author: Herda TJ, Ryan ED, Beck TW, Costa PB, DeFreitas JM, Stout JR, Cramer JT.
    Journal: J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Jun 15; 171(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18405977.
    Abstract:
    This study examined the reliability of mechanomyographic amplitude (MMG RMS) and mean power frequency (MMG MPF) for the vastus lateralis during isometric maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) and submaximal step and ramp muscle actions of the leg extensors. Nineteen participants (mean+/-S.D. age=24+/-4 yrs) performed two isometric MVCs, 10 randomly ordered isometric step muscle actions at 5, 15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, 75, 85, and 95% of MVC, and two 6s isometric ramp muscle actions during 3 trials separated by 3-5 days. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of the measurement (SEM), and minimal difference (MD) were used for test-retest reliability, while repeated measures ANOVAs were used to quantify systematic variability. Systematic variability was only present across the 3 trials at 5% MVC during the step muscle action for MMG RMS and at 35% of MVC during the ramp muscle action for MMG MPF. The ICCs ranged from 0.39 to 0.89 and 0.36 to 0.80, while the SEM (% of mean) ranged from 14.9 to 33.9% and 6.9 to18.9% for MMG RMS and MMG MPF, respectively. Thus, MMG RMS and MMG MPF demonstrated reliability that was comparable to that of the surface electromyographic signal.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]