These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Diastolic filling parameters derived from myocardial perfusion imaging can predict left ventricular end-diastolic pressure at subsequent cardiac catheterization. Author: Patel D, Robinson VJ, Arteaga RB, Thornton JW. Journal: J Nucl Med; 2008 May; 49(5):746-51. PubMed ID: 18413386. Abstract: UNLABELLED: Morbidity and mortality increase when diastolic dysfunction accompanies coronary artery disease (CAD). An elevated stress (201)Tl lung-to-heart ratio (LHR) is a traditional marker of elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), which adds prognostic value in CAD. Since the introduction of (99m)Tc-labeled agents, this valuable marker has been lost. Hence, there is only a limited ability to assess diastolic dysfunction by myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). METHODS: Fifty-two consecutive patients with an ejection fraction of >or=45% underwent MPI and cardiac catheterization within 15 d. Peak filling rate (PFR), time to PFR (TPFR), and filling rate during the first third of diastole (1/3FR) were obtained from MPI with SPECT software. Resting (201)Tl LHR was calculated manually, and LVEDP was obtained at catheterization. RESULTS: PFR, TPFR, and 1/3FR correlated significantly with LVEDP (r= -0.53, 0.45, and -0.45, respectively; P=0.00005, 0.0009, and 0.0009, respectively), whereas resting (201)Tl LHR did not (r=0.10, P=0.49). Receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis of PFR, TPFR, and 1/3FR for detecting LVEDPs of >or=18 mm Hg showed areas under the curve of 0.83, 0.75, and 0.80, respectively. The combination of PFR and 1/3FR showed a negative predictive value of 84%, a positive predictive value of 86%, and a specificity of 94%. CONCLUSION: Diastolic filling variables obtained with the SPECT software showed a significant correlation with LVEDP. PFR, TPFR, and 1/3FR were superior to resting (201)Tl LHR and showed good sensitivity, specificity, and predictive power for detecting LVEDPs of >or=18 mm Hg. Hence, combining data on the presence of perfusion defects with data on diastolic impairments can be achieved by adding these variables to MPI results.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]