These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: High-energy transurethral thermotherapy with CoreTherm approaches transurethral prostate resection in outcome efficacy: a meta-analysis.
    Author: Kaye JD, Smith AD, Badlani GH, Lee BR, Ost MC.
    Journal: J Endourol; 2008 Apr; 22(4):713-8. PubMed ID: 18419216.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Minimally invasive office-based treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are challenging the traditional surgical and medical management options for symptomatic BPH. We conducted a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials that compared high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (HE-TUMT) with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to compare subjective and objective outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search using Pub-Med was conducted to obtain all published data on HE-TUMT and all randomized controlled trials that compared HE-TUMT with TURP. Data were analyzed focusing on the pretreatment and posttreatment end points of the International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS), maximum flow rate (Q(max)), and postvoid residual (PVR). A meta-analysis was conducted, and data were stratified with respect to the type of HE-TUMT machinery used. RESULTS: A total of 458 patients were studied. Differences in IPSS, Q(max), and PVR from current trials that compared TURP with HE-TUMT are best evaluated at 1-year follow-up. At this time point, changes in Q(max) (P < 0.001), IPSS (P = 0.01), and PVR (P = 0.02) are more significant if TURP is the management mode. HE-TUMT with the CoreTherm() device demonstrates the most significant improvements in subjective and objective criteria that approximate outcomes with TURP (Figs. 1-3). CONCLUSIONS: A meta-analysis of current randomized controlled trials that compared TURP with HE-TUMT demonstrates more significant changes in Q(max), IPSS, and PVR when TURP is used to manage symptomatic BPH. Despite these statistical differences, stratified data demonstrate that current HE-TUMT machinery is more effective than previously used lower-energy machinery, especially at objective end points. This is most evident when the CoreTherm device is used. These findings, coupled with the decreased costs and morbidity associated with HE-TUMT, support this treatment as a reasonable alternative to TURP.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]