These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Vena caval flow patterns in patients with constrictive pericarditis: analysis by catheter-tip Doppler flowmetry].
    Author: Fukuda K, Handa S, Abe S, Kyotani S, Inoue S, Negishi K, Satoh T, Hori S, Nakamura Y.
    Journal: J Cardiol; 1991; 21(2):415-22. PubMed ID: 1841928.
    Abstract:
    Changes in superior and inferior vena caval flow patterns were analyzed in 5 patients with constrictive pericarditis and were compared with those of 10 normal control subjects. Caval flows were measured using catheter-tip Doppler flowmeters. The normal controls showed biphasic M-shaped flow patterns; the peaks of the first forward flow (S wave) and of the second forward flow (D wave) appeared coincident with mid-systole and mid-diastole, respectively. Reverse flows fell during the atrial contraction period (A wave) and late systole (V wave). In the normal controls, the ratios of the S wave to the D wave (S/D ratio) and the A wave to the S wave (A/S ratio) were 2.15 +/- 0.41 and 0.18 +/- 0.10, respectively, and there was a disproportionate respiratory variation in the S and D waves in the normal controls. In constrictive pericarditis, superior and inferior vena caval flow velocities were lower than those in the normal controls. The S/D and A/S ratios were 1.46 +/- 0.27 (p < 0.05 vs control) and 0.66 +/- 0.15 (p < 0.01 vs control), respectively, with the A wave increasing in proportion to the severity of constrictive pericarditis. In addition, there was only a minimal respiratory variation in constrictive pericarditis. In conclusion, recognition of the patterns of the superior and inferior vena caval flow velocities may be useful for diagnosing constrictive pericarditis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]