These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Effect of L-carnitine in patients with ischemic heart disease].
    Author: Fujiwara M, Nakano T, Tamoto S, Yamada Y, Fukai M, Takada K, Ashida H, Shimada T, Ishihara T, Seki I.
    Journal: J Cardiol; 1991; 21(2):493-504. PubMed ID: 1841935.
    Abstract:
    To assess the protective effects of L-carnitine (LC) infusion on ischemic heart disease, 30 patients who had angina and ischemic ECG changes during exercise were evaluated by bicycle ergometry. They were categorized in LC and non-treatment (NT) groups. There were no significant differences in age and sex between the 2 groups. Before exercise, 15 patients (9 males and 6 females) received 60 mg/kg LC and the results including hemodynamics, coronary circulation, and cardiac metabolism at rest and during exercise were compared with those of the NT group studied in the same protocol (50 watts x to cycle, 15 min). At the end of 30 min LC drip infusion, the arterial carnitine content (LC (a)) reached 1,980 +/- 257.3 microM and then was maintained at 1,212.7 +/- 136.2 microM during exercise. There was no correlation of LC (a) with the coronary arterio-venous difference nor with myocardial uptake of LC. Although there was no significant difference in coronary blood flow (CBF: mliters/100 g/min) between the LC and NT groups at rest (LC: 92.1 +/- 29.0 vs NT: 88.0 +/- 26.5), CBF during exercise increased significantly in the LC group compared with the NT group (LC: 230.4 +/- 113.8 vs NT: 139.1 +/- 52.7; p < 0.05). In the NT group, there was no significant change in coronary arterio-venous oxygen difference ((a-cs) O2: vol %) during exercise, but in the LC group (a-cs) O2 increased significantly from 10.2 +/- 1.3 to 11.5 +/- 1.9 (p < 0.01). Furthermore, although there was no significant difference in myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2: mliters/100 g/min) at rest between the 2 groups (LC: 9.30 +/- 2.96 vs NT: 9.71 +/- 3.09), it increased significantly in the LC group compared with the NT group during exercise (LC: 25.11 +/- 9.98 vs NT: 15.55 +/- 6.09). MVO2/LVWI (LVWI = left ventricular work index) and MVO2MT (MT = myocardial tension) did not significantly differ at rest between the 2 groups. However, these 2 indices decreased significantly during exercise (p < 0.05) in the NT group, and remained unchanged in the LC group, showing a significant difference between the 2 groups (both p < 0.05). In myocardial energy substrates, the myocardial uptake ((a-cs) x CBF) of free fatty acid (FFA: muEq/100 g/min) increased significantly in the LC group compared with that of the NT group (LC: 10.16 +/- 13.26-->31.88 +/- 27.58* vs NT: 16.02 +/- 27.92-->18.11 +/- 31.00;* = p < 0.05, LC vs NT).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]