These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Questionable 16S ribosomal RNA gene annotations are frequent in completed microbial genomes.
    Author: Lin YH, Chang BC, Chiang PW, Tang SL.
    Journal: Gene; 2008 Jun 15; 416(1-2):44-7. PubMed ID: 18420359.
    Abstract:
    According to recent reports, many ribosomal RNA gene annotations are still questionable, and the use of inappropriate tools for annotation has been blamed. However, we believe that the abundant 16S rRNA partial sequence in the databases, mainly created by culture-independent PCR methods, is another main cause of the ambiguous annotations of 16S rRNA. To examine the current status of 16S rRNA gene annotations in complete microbial genomes, we used as a criterion the conserved anti-SD sequence, located at the 3' end of the 16S rRNA gene, which is commonly overlooked by culture-independent PCR methods. In our large survey, 859 16S rRNA gene sequences from 252 different species of the microbial complete genomes were inspected. 67 species (234 genes) were detected with ambiguous annotations. The common anti-SD sequence and other conserved 16S rRNA sequence features could be detected in the downstream-intergenic regions for almost every questionable sequence, indicating that many of the 16S rRNA genes were annotated incorrectly. Furthermore, we found that more than 91.5% of the 93,716 sequences of the available 16S rRNA in the main databases are partial sequences. We also performed BLAST analysis for every questionable rRNA sequence, and most of the best hits in the analysis were rRNA partial sequences. This result indicates that partial sequences are prevalent in the databases, and that these sequences have significantly affected the accuracy of microbial genomic annotation. We suggest that the annotation of 16S rRNA genes in newly complete microbial genomes must be done in more detail, and that revision of questionable rRNA annotations should commence as soon as possible.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]