These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Prospective evaluation of a transfusion policy of D+ red blood cells into D- patients.
    Author: Gonzalez-Porras JR, Graciani IF, Perez-Simon JA, Martin-Sanchez J, Encinas C, Conde MP, Nieto MJ, Corral M.
    Journal: Transfusion; 2008 Jul; 48(7):1318-24. PubMed ID: 18422846.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Although D- patients should receive red blood cells (RBCs) from D- donors, the scarcity of D- blood components in certain situations makes the transfusion of D+ RBCs unavoidable. Therefore it is recommended that guidelines be developed in order to standardize transfusion policy in these scenarios. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We have prospectively evaluated a policy for the use of D+ RBCs in 905 D- patients. The amount of D- RBCs saved as well as the incidence of hemolytic reactions and anti-D alloimmunization were assessed. RESULTS: 554 patients received D- RBCs while 351 received a total of 1032 D+ RBCs, all of them within our criteria for the acceptable use of D+ RBCs. This strategy allowed us to save 25.6 percent of D- RBCs (1032 out of 4024 RBCs requested). No hemolytic reactions were reported. The incidence of alloimmunization was 21.4 percent. Most patients who developed anti-D did so within the first 2 or 4 RBCs transfused (64% after the first 2 RBCs transfused and 88% after the first 4). In multivariate analysis the age of less than 77 years was the only predictor for alloimmuization (HR = 2.48 [95% CI = 1.21-3.81]; p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: The use of D+ RBCs in selected D- patients does not induce adverse reactions and allows the saving of a significant number of D- RBCs.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]