These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Reduction in beta2-microglobulin with super-flux versus high-flux dialysis membranes: results of a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.
    Author: Pellicano R, Polkinghorne KR, Kerr PG.
    Journal: Am J Kidney Dis; 2008 Jul; 52(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 18423807.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Uremic toxicity is a major concern in the dialysis population. There is keen interest in techniques that increase the removal of larger uremic molecules. We examined the short-term impact of a new, more porous, super-flux Helixone membrane (FX-E) versus the conventional high-flux Helixone membrane (FX-60) on beta(2)-microglobulin (beta2M) reduction and nutritional and inflammatory parameters. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, double blind, crossover, pilot trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: A single freestanding dialysis center. 30 stable hemodialysis patients. INTERVENTION: Patients were treated with FX-60 and FX-E membranes for a treatment period of 6 weeks each, with a 2-week washout period in between. OUTCOME & MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was change in beta2M concentrations from baseline to end of treatment. Serum samples were obtained predialysis and postdialysis at 0, 2, and 6 weeks, and dialysate albumin samples were collected continuously throughout dialysis sessions. RESULTS: Mean postdialysis beta2M concentrations at the end of 6 weeks of treatment were 6.73 mg/L for FX-E versus 8.22 mg/L for FX-60, which was significantly lower overall by 0.69 mg/L (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.09 to -0.29; P = 0.001). beta2M reduction ratios were greater overall with FX-E by 4.83% (95% CI, 2.78 to 6.89; P < 0.001), with mean values of 57% for FX-60 versus 66% for FX-E at the end of treatment. Median dialysate albumin loss with FX-E was 1.23 g (range, 0.22 to 4.83 g) compared with 0.17 g (range, 0.0017 to 2.69 g) with FX-60, which was greater by 1.52 g (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.93; P < 0.001). Serum albumin concentrations were slightly lower with FX-E by 0.1 g/dL (0.55 g/L; 95% CI, -1.04 to -0.07; P = 0.03), but prealbumin concentrations were not significantly different at 8.53 mg/L (95% CI, -23.76 to 6.71; P = 0.3). There were no differences in inflammatory cytokine concentrations or small-solute removal. LIMITATIONS: Short-term pilot study. CONCLUSION: In this stable dialysis population, removal of beta2M was more efficient with the Helixone super-flux FX-E membrane, with only a small decrease in albumin concentrations despite increased albumin loss. Large trials with longer treatment periods are required to evaluate the impact of the FX-E membrane on clinical outcomes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]