These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effects of the selective EET antagonist, 14,15-EEZE, on cardioprotection produced by exogenous or endogenous EETs in the canine heart.
    Author: Gross GJ, Gauthier KM, Moore J, Falck JR, Hammock BD, Campbell WB, Nithipatikom K.
    Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2008 Jun; 294(6):H2838-44. PubMed ID: 18441205.
    Abstract:
    Previously, we demonstrated (17) that 11,12- and 14,15-epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) produce marked reductions in myocardial infarct size. Although it is assumed that this cardioprotective effect of the EETs is due to a specific interaction with a membrane-bound receptor, no evidence has indicated that novel EET antagonists selectively block the EET actions in dogs. Our goals were to investigate the effects of 11,12- and 14,15-EET, the soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor, 12-(3-adamantan-1-yl-ureido)-dodecanoic acid (AUDA), and the putative selective EET antagonist, 14,15-epoxyeicosa-5(Z)-enoic acid (14,15-EEZE), on infarct size of barbital anesthetized dogs subjected to 60 min of coronary artery occlusion and 3 h of reperfusion. Furthermore, the effect of 14,15-EEZE on the cardioprotective actions of the selective mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium channel opener diazoxide was investigated. Both 11,12- and 14,15-EET markedly reduced infarct size [expressed as a percentage of the area at risk (IS/AAR)] from 21.8 +/- 1.6% (vehicle) to 8.7 +/- 2.2 and 9.4 +/- 1.3%, respectively. Similarly, AUDA significantly reduced IS/AAR from 21.8 +/- 1.6 to 14.4 +/- 1.2% (low dose) and 9.4 +/- 1.8% (high dose), respectively. Interestingly, the combination of the low dose of AUDA with 14,15-EET reduced IS/AAR to 5.8 +/- 1.6% (P < 0.05), further than either drug alone. Diazoxide also reduced IS/AAR significantly (10.2 +/- 1.9%). In contrast, 14,15-EEZE had no effect on IS/AAR by itself (21.0 +/- 3.6%), but completely abolished the effect of 11,12-EET (17.8 +/- 1.4%) and 14,15-EET (19.2 +/- 2.4%) and AUDA (19.3 +/- 1.6%), but not that of diazoxide (10.4 +/- 1.4%). These results suggest that activation of the EET pathway, acting on a putative receptor, by exogenous EETs or indirectly by blocking EET metabolism, produced marked cardioprotection, and the combination of these two approaches resulted in a synergistic effect. These data also suggest that 14,15-EEZE is not blocking the mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium channel as a mechanism for antagonizing the cardioprotective effects of the EETs.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]