These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Sub-processes of working memory in the N-back task: an investigation using ERPs.
    Author: Chen YN, Mitra S, Schlaghecken F.
    Journal: Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 119(7):1546-59. PubMed ID: 18448388.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The N-back task is frequently used in working memory studies. N-parameters allow experimental psychologists to analyze the sub-processes of N-back tasks in addition to general processing. However, previous imaging studies have not closely scrutinized these sub-processes. In the current study, three sub-processes in the N-back task were proposed using a logical task analysis: matching, replacement and shift. Domain-specific lateralization in spatial and verbal working memory was investigated in terms of this model. METHODS: This model was tested with two ERP experiments during N-back tasks, one conceptual (top-down) and one data-driven (bottom-up). RESULTS: Domain-specific lateralization was observed as predicted in the shift sub-process of the conceptual task and in the replacement sub-process of the data-driven task. Match-specific lateralization was also found. CONCLUSIONS: The results support our three-sub-process model of the N-back task and our hypothesis that replacement is a data-driven process with a posterior locus whereas shift is a more conceptual process with a more frontal locus. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed model correctly predicted ERP patterns in conceptual and data-driven N-back tasks and is potentially useful in understanding the neurophysiologic basis of N-back task performance. The similarity between match- and domain-specific lateralization in N-back tasks raised several issues for further investigation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]