These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Asymmetry of voice onset time-processing in adult developmental dyslexics.
    Author: Giraud K, Trébuchon-DaFonseca A, Démonet JF, Habib M, Liégeois-Chauvel C.
    Journal: Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 119(7):1652-63. PubMed ID: 18456549.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The human auditory cortex codes speech temporally according to sequential acoustico-phonetic cues like the voice onset time (VOT). This coding is predominantly left-lateralized in normal readers. We examined VOT-processing asymmetries in adults with a history of developmental dyslexia (DD-history+). METHODS: Auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) to voiced (/ba/) and voiceless (/pa/) speech stimuli were recorded from 10 DD-history+ adults and 8 controls. Source modelling of the "release component" (RC: approximately 240 ms; time-locked to voiced consonantal release and considered reflective of VOT-processing) was conducted to explore VOT asymmetries. RESULTS: Controls demonstrated L>R RC source probe amplitude asymmetry in the auditory cortex. DD-history+ subjects with little persistent reading deficit (n=5) demonstrated normal temporal coding but rightward asymmetry. DD-history+ subjects with severe persistent deficits (n=5) exhibited numerous supplemental AEP components (notably left hemispheric) and inconsistent asymmetry (leftward or alternating). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings suggest that DD-history+ adults process auditory speech cues differently than adults without previous DD. The nature of this processing may relate to the severity of persistent reading deficits. SIGNIFICANCE: Previous dyslexics with little persistent deficit can exhibit atypical functional asymmetry with normal auditory temporal coding. Source modelling represents an effective, non-invasive means of exploring processing asymmetries in clinical populations.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]