These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effect of type of cryoprotectant on morphology and developmental competence of in vitro-matured buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) oocytes subjected to slow freezing or vitrification.
    Author: Gautam SK, Verma V, Palta P, Chauhan MS, Manik RS.
    Journal: Reprod Fertil Dev; 2008; 20(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 18462611.
    Abstract:
    The present study examined the effects of different cryoprotectants on morphology and developmental competence of in vitro-matured buffalo oocytes after slow freezing or vitrification. After slow freezing in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethylene glycol (EG) or 1,2-propanediol (PROH), at 1.0 or 1.5 m each, the proportion of morphologically normal oocytes recovered was significantly higher (P < 0.05) with 1.5 than 1.0 m for all cryoprotectants and was highest (P < 0.05) for 1.5 m DMSO. Following vitrification, the percentage of morphologically normal oocytes recovered was lower (P < 0.01) for 40% EG than for 40% DMSO, 20% EG + 20% DMSO or 20% EG + 20% PROH. The most common damage, irrespective of the cryopreservation method, was loss of cumulus mass. The cleavage rate and the proportion of vitrified-warmed oocytes that developed to morulae/blastocysts were significantly higher (P < 0.01) for 20% EG + 20% DMSO than for the other groups. A higher proportion of oocytes developed to morulae (11.5% v. 4.3%) or blastocysts (5.4% v. 0.6%) after vitrification in 20% EG + 20% DMSO than after slow freezing in 1.5 m DMSO. In conclusion, vitrification was more effective than slow freezing for the cryopreservation of in vitro-matured buffalo oocytes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]