These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [High vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of uterine prolapse].
    Author: Lu YX, Shen WJ, Liu X, Liu JX, Zhang YH, Zhao Y, Zhang L, Hu ML, Ge J, Ke N.
    Journal: Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Dec; 42(12):797-801. PubMed ID: 18476508.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the physiological and anatomic basis,indications,surgical skills, prevention of ureter injury and clinic outcomes of using high uterosacral ligament suspension (HUS) for correction of advanced uterine prolapse by the vaginal route. METHODS: Fifty women with advanced uterine prolapse underwent transvaginal HUS after vaginal hysterectomy with reconstruction of pubocervical and rectovaginal fascia to correct their uterine prolapse between June 2003 and September 2007. The average age of the women was 60.1 years. The mean follow-up period was 24 months (range 4-51 months). The degree of pelvic organ prolapse preoperatively and anatomic outcomes postoperatively were assessed with pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q). RESULTS: The remnants of the uterosacral ligaments were clearly identified and palpated posterior and medial to the ischial spines by traction with a 24 cm long Allis clamp and used for successful vaginal vault suspension and reconstruction in all 50 consecutive advanced uterine prolapse patients. The ureter injury was avoided by complete knowledge of the ureter's course from the cervix/apex toward its insertion in the sacral region and how far outside of the uterosacral ligament, by uteri palpation and by suturing purposefully placed "deep" dorsally and posteriorly toward the sacrum, as well as by cystoscopy examination of the spillage of urine from both ureters. Mean POP-Q point C improved from 1.5 to -7.5 cm with a median follow-up of 24 months. If the successful HUS was defined as point C < or = stage I prolapse, both the objective and subjective cure rates were as high as 100% with a maximum follow-up of 51 months. None of the 50 patients had repeat operation for recurrence of prolapse. There was no major intra-or postoperative complications, such as ureter and other pelvic organ injury. CONCLUSION: HUS with fascial reconstruction seems to be a safe, minimal traumatic, tolerable and highly successful procedure for vaginal repair of advanced uterine prolapse. Because of the use of native tissue as suspension site HUS is more physiologic and cost effective.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]