These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Influence of aging treatments on microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to primary dentin.
    Author: Rocha R, Soares FZ, Rodrigues CR, Rodrigues Filho LE.
    Journal: J Dent Child (Chic); 2007; 74(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 18477429.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro influence of aging treatments on the microtensile bond strength of 2-step total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems to primary dentin. METHODS: Class I cavities (4 mm x 4 mm x 2 mm) were prepared in 80 extracted human primary molars divided into 8 groups (N=5) per adhesive system: (1) Single Bond (SI); and (2) Clearfil SE Bond (SE). Restored teeth were exposed to individual and combined aging treatments: (1) thermal (2,000 x at 5-55 degrees C; T); (2) mechanical load (100,000 x 80 N; M); (3) pH (mineralizing/demineralizing solutions; pH); and (4) control (24-hour water storage; C). Beam-shaped microtensile specimens were prepared (0.8 mm2 cross-sectional area) and loaded at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/minute in a universal testing machine. Fracture modes were examined by scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: Means (MPa) and standard deviations (+/-) were: (1) SI-T=24.17 (+/-1.99); (2) SI-M=25.64 (+/-9.75); (3) Si-pH=23.43 (+/-4.19); (4) SI-C=33.81 (+/-2.45); (5) SI-TM=18.60 (+/-3.57); (6) SI-TpH=23.90 (+/-4.28); (7) SI-MpH=20.96 (+/-4.06); (8) SI-TMpH=20.94 (+/-3.15); (9) SE-T=24.08 (+/-4.52); (10) SE-M=18.30 (+/-14.12); (11) SE-pH=19.22 (+/-8.93); (12) SE-C=37.80 (+/-7.28); (13) SE-TM=22.89 (+/-11.74); (14) SE-TpH=27.87 (+/-12.77); (15) SE-MpH=18.87 (+/-10.95); and (16) SE-TMpH=22.55 (+/-3.05). Both adhesive systems presented similar dentin bond strength (P>.05) which were significantly reduced when combined aging treatments were applied or when pH cycling (pH) was done. CONCLUSION(S): Combined aging treatments and also pH cycling alone influenced negatively adhesive bond strengths.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]