These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Bench study of auto-CPAP devices using a collapsible upper airway model with upstream resistance.
    Author: Hirose M, Honda J, Sato E, Shinbo T, Kokubo K, Ichiwata T, Kobayashi H.
    Journal: Respir Physiol Neurobiol; 2008 Jun 30; 162(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 18499537.
    Abstract:
    The aim of this study was to investigate the response of auto-CPAP devices to respiratory events (apnea, hypopnea, flow-limitation and snoring) on the same condition using a physiological upper airway model. The hypothesis of this study is that collapsibility of the flow-limiting collapsible segment of the airway is influenced by the upstream airway resistance. Five auto-CPAP devices, AutoSet T, AutoSet Spirit, Goodnight 420E, PV10i and REMstar Auto were evaluated. Apnea: all the devices increased the auto-CPAP level, while AutoSet T and AutoSet Spirit did not respond to apnea for 30s. Hypopnea: all the devices except the AutoSet T and Goodnight 420E increased pressure. Flow-limitation: all the devices except the PV10i and REMstar Auto increased pressure. Snoring: the snoring sounds disappeared when REMstar Auto and PV10i were used, and the Goodnight 420E lowered the level of snoring. In conclusion, the response of auto-CPAP devices to respiratory events differed. Collapsible upper airway model with upstream resistance is useful for the first-step assessment of auto-CPAP devices.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]