These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Is the treatment effect of IFN-beta restored after the disappearance of neutralizing antibodies?
    Author: Sorensen PS, Koch-Henriksen N, Flachs EM, Bendtzen K.
    Journal: Mult Scler; 2008 Jul; 14(6):837-42. PubMed ID: 18505772.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To establish whether multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, who have lost the therapeutic effect of interferon-beta (IFN-beta) owing to neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and subsequently revert from a NAb-positive to a NAb-negative state under continued IFN-beta-1b therapy, regain clinical effect after reversion. BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that a significant proportion of patients treated with IFN-beta develop NAbs that hamper or abolish the therapeutic effect of IFN-beta. However, some patients, who become NAb-positive under treatment with IFN-beta-1b, may revert to a NAb-negative state under continuous treatment. METHODS: We identified 40 patients from the Danish IFN protocol, who fulfilled the criteria: NAb-positive status for at least 12 months followed by reversion to NAb-negative state for at least 12 months. For comparison, we included 64 matching cases that had remained NAb-negative during an observation time of at least 36 months. The two groups were clinically and demographically alike. We measured NAb-neutralizing capacity using a clinically validated cytopathic effect assay. A blood sample with a neutralizing capacity of 20% or more was considered as NAb-positive. A patient was defined as NAb-positive after two consecutive blood tests separated by at least 6 months. Reversion to a NAb-negative state required at least two consecutive negative tests. To allow for the confounding effect of time we employed a mixed Poisson model. RESULTS: Patients who had been NAb-positive and reverted to a NAb-negative state regained treatment effect with the relapse rate as before the NAb-positive period adjusting for the effect of time, and the relapse rate was the same as in the permanently NAb-negative patients in corresponding time periods. The relapse rate ratio comparing the NAb-positive with the NAb-negative periods was 1.98 (95% confidence interval: 1.32-2.97). CONCLUSION: Under NAb-positive periods, the clinical effect of IFN-beta was abolished. When NAbs disappeared spontaneously under continued treatment, patients regained the full effect of INF-beta-1b therapy with no negative carry-over effect from the previous NAb-positive period.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]