These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Introduction of a critical incident reporting system in a surgical university clinic. What can be achieved in a short term?].
    Author: Domínguez Fernández E, Kolios G, Schlosser K, Wissner W, Rothmund M.
    Journal: Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Jun; 133(23):1229-34. PubMed ID: 18509798.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: "Critical incident reporting systems" (CIRS) are voluntary systems which, within the framework of risk management, provide pointers to the type and origin of critical incidents (including "errors"). The interest in introducing a CIRS is great, but whether it can fulfill its promises remains to be clarified. The aim of this study was to answer the question of whether an CIRS in a structured form would be acceptable to staff and whether it would be suitable for introducing targeted measures for achieving improvements. METHODS: The introduction of a CIRS in the Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery proceeded according to the recommendations of the Action Alliance for Patients' Safety (Aktionsbündnis für Patientensicherheit e.V.). RESULTS: During a period of 13 months we received a total of 96 reports, 29.3% from various levels of carers/nurses, while 35.4% were from doctors. 40.6% of the incidents had been observed by the reporting person, in 38.5% of cases the reporting person had been involved in the incident and in 12.5% this person had helped in dealing with the incident. 38.5% of the reported critical incidents occurred between 06.00 and 12.00, while 34.4% occurred between 12:00 and 18:00 o/c. In 32.3% of cases the estimated duration of dealing with the incident was under four hours and between four and eight hours in 26%. During the first year of this study 12 actions were started and continued in consequence of an analysis of the reported critical incidents. CONCLUSION: After one year of the study it was found that a CIRS can be reliably introduced into a surgical department in accordance with the recommendations of the Action Alliane for Patients' Safety. When introduced correctly CIRS provides valuable information, which will lead to risk reduction in surgery.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]