These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Impact of oxygen extraction fraction on long-term prognosis in patients with reduced blood flow and vasoreactivity because of occlusive carotid artery disease. Author: Hokari M, Kuroda S, Shiga T, Nakayama N, Tamaki N, Iwasaki Y. Journal: Surg Neurol; 2009 May; 71(5):532-8; discussion 538, 538-9. PubMed ID: 18514278. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Reduced cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular reactivity to acetazolamide (type 3 ischemia) is believed as an independent predictor for subsequent ischemic stroke in patients with occlusive carotid artery diseases. However, recent studies have shown that type 3 patients can be divided into 2 pathophysiologically different subgroups as follows: those with elevated OEF and those with normal OEF. This study was aimed to clarify whether there is a difference in the prognosis between patients with type 3 and elevated OEF and those with type 3 but normal OEF. METHODS: Twenty type 3 patients were enrolled in this prospective, longitudinal cohort study. Hemodynamic and metabolic parameters were quantitatively determined by (15)O-gas PET. All of them were medically treated. RESULTS: Oxygen extraction fraction was elevated in 9 patients but was normal in other 11. During an average follow-up period of 45.6 months, 3 of 9 patients with type 3 and elevated OEF developed ipsilateral ischemic stroke. The annual risk was 10.6%. The location and shape of cerebral infarction strongly suggested a key role of hemodynamic compromise in their recurrence. On the other hand, no subsequent stroke occurred in none of 11 patients with type 3 but normal OEF. There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of ipsilateral ischemic stroke between 2 groups (P = .0303). CONCLUSION: Type 3 patients may be categorized into 2 subgroups as follows: those with elevated OEF and higher stroke risk and those with normal OEF and lower stroke risk, although larger number of subjects should be analyzed.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]