These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of the acoustic and neural distortion product at 2f1-f2 in normal-hearing adults.
    Author: Elsisy H, Krishnan A.
    Journal: Int J Audiol; 2008 Jul; 47(7):431-8. PubMed ID: 18574781.
    Abstract:
    Input/output functions of the simultaneously recorded acoustic distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) and neural frequency following-response distortion products (FFR-DP) at 2f1-f2 were evaluated to determine if these two representations of cochlear nonlinearity exhibit similar response behavior, which would suggest shared cochlear generators. Responses were recorded from normal-hearing adults for a tone burst stimulus pair (F1: 500 Hz; F2: 612 Hz) at 40-70 dB nHL. DPOAE responses were recorded from the ear canal, and FFR responses were recorded differentially from scalp electrodes, representing a vertical configuration. The input/output function for FFR-DP revealed a compressive saturating nonlinearity, whereas the DPOAE input/output function exhibited a linear growth at higher intensities following a compressive behavior at moderate levels. Results appear to suggest that cochlear generators may be contributing differentially to the acoustic and the neural distortion products. Also, FFR-DP responses appeared more identifiable and less variable, particularly at lower stimulus levels, than the corresponding DPOAE. These findings may point to a potential benefit of applying FFR testing to complement DPOAE in evaluating cochlear function at low frequencies.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]