These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Ventricular-arterial coupling in patients with heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy: may we predict the long-term clinical response?
    Author: Zanon F, Aggio S, Baracca E, Pastore G, Corbucci G, Boaretto G, Braggion G, Piergentili C, Rigatelli G, Roncon L.
    Journal: Eur J Echocardiogr; 2009 Jan; 10(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 18579495.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) in patients with refractory congestive heart failure (HF), left bundle brunch block, and sinus rhythm. BACKGROUND: The ratio between arterial elastance (Ea) and left ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees), the so-called VAC, defines the efficiency of the myocardium in pumping blood. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients were studied with echocardiography before CRT, and 1 year later. End-systolic elastance was calculated according to the method of Chen. Arterial elastance (ratio of the systolic pressure to the stroke volume), end-systolic volume (ESV), and quality of life (QoL) (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire) were assessed at the baseline and after 1 year. Patients with a reduction>15% of ESV or a decrease>33% in QoL score were considered responders to CRT. RESULTS: QRS duration and interventricular delay were significantly reduced with CRT compared with baseline (156+/-2 vs. 195+/-3 ms, P<0.001; and 25+/-2 vs. 55+/-3 ms, P<0.001, respectively). Arterial elastance/Ees decreased significantly on CRT (2.47+/-1.48 vs. 1.41+/-0.87, P<0.0001). The lowering of Ea/Ees was congruent to a decrease in intraventricular delay (83.1+/-55.7 vs. 28.4+/-49.5 ms, P<0.0001) and an increase in ejection fraction (26+/-6.3 vs. 36.9+/-8.0%, P<0.0001). Responders to CRT were 74 and 71% of the overall patient population, considering as endpoint QoL or ESV, respectively. The analysis of VAC showed a baseline cut-off value of 2, above which 88% and 69% of patients responded to CRT, considering as endpoint QoL or ESV, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The non-invasive assessment of VAC may be proposed as an immediate, easy, and optimal tool for quantifying the effect of CRT in patients with HF.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]