These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of nonacoustic schwannomas.
    Author: Hamm KD, Gross MW, Fahrig A, Surber G, Henzel M, Kleinert G, Grabenbauer GG, Engenhart-Cabillic R.
    Journal: Neurosurgery; 2008 May; 62(5 Suppl):A29-36; discussion A36. PubMed ID: 18580778.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Nonacoustic schwannomas are rare tumors in contrast to the most common neuromas of Cranial Nerve VIII. The current treatment of choice in these cases is microsurgical resection, but the risk of postoperative complications is high, especially in cavernous sinus-invading tumors. In many of these cases, it is not possible to achieve complete tumor removal, resulting in the probability of recurrences. For those patients, radiosurgery (RS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) can offer an alternate treatment. METHODS: Within a 5-year period (2000-2005), 19 intracranial nonacoustic neuromas were treated with SRT-13 trigeminal neuromas, five neuromas of the lower cranial nerves (jugular foramen), and one located in the orbital region. Of these cases, there were nine women and 10 men who were, on average, 54 years of age (range, 33-83 yr). Eight patients had previously undergone surgery elsewhere and showed progressive tumor growth. All 19 patients were treated with SRT: 15 with normal fractions of 1.8-2 Gy single dose up to 54-59.4 Gy. Their irregular tumor volume ranged from 4.2 to 43.1 ccm (average: 14.1 ccm). Hypofractionation with 6 to 7 x 5 Gy was applied in four cases with an average tumor volume of 4.1 ccm (2.2-6.2 ccm). Clinical results and the efficacy for tumor control with an average follow-up of 35 months (11-63 mo) were evaluated. RESULTS: Local tumor control rate was 95% (18 of 19 cases): one patient previously operated on had a recurrence of tumor progression after SRT, followed by a second subtotal resection. A tumor regression was proved in 11 cases (one neuroma disappeared and four patients had tumor shrinkage of more than 50%, the other six experienced shrinkage between 20% and 40%). Within the first 6 months, two patients developed temporarily increased tumor volume as well as a confirmed reaction to irradiation. In one of these two cases, there were mild side effects according to CTC Grade I. No patient experienced a new or increased neurological deficit. Improvement of their cranial nerve disturbances was achieved in 11 of 19 patients and the other eight showed no clinical changes. The mostly moderate trigeminal pain decreased slowly. CONCLUSION: SRT is a low-risk and effective treatment option for intracranial neuromas. Particularly in cases of sinus cavernous-invading trigeminal and in jugular foramen tumors, SRT can be the treatment of choice. Concerning tumor regression, SRT is as effective as RS.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]