These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Does HbA1C predict isolated impaired fasting glycaemia in the oral glucose tolerance test in subjects with impaired fasting glycaemia?
    Author: Likhari T, Aulakh TS, Singh BM, Gama R.
    Journal: Ann Clin Biochem; 2008 Jul; 45(Pt 4):418-20. PubMed ID: 18583629.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: To assess the usefulness of erythrocyte glycated haemoglobin (HbA1C) as a screening tool to identify those subjects with impaired fasting glycaemia (IFG) who do not have impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or diabetes mellitus (DM) on a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Design and methods All subjects undergoing an OGTT had HbA1C measured at baseline. Receiver operator characteristics analysis was used to identify optimal HbA1C cut-off values for diagnosing and excluding IGT and DM. RESULTS: We studied 140 subjects (69 women) with IFG (fasting capillary plasma glucose between 6.1-6.9 mmol/L). Using World Health Organisation criteria, 27 had isolated IFG, 56 had IGT and 57 had DM. HbA1C was higher (P < 0.001) in patients with DM (6.8 +/- 0.93%) when compared with those with IGT (6.3 +/- 0.68%) and isolated IFG (6.2 +/- 0.30%), but HbA1C was similar in those with IGT and isolated IFG. There was no HbA1C cut-off value differentiating isolated IFG from IGT or DM. None of the subjects with isolated IFG had HbA1C concentration of >6.8%, but 76% and 54% subjects with IGT and DM, respectively, had HbA1C of < or =6.8%. CONCLUSIONS: HbA1C measurement is of limited value in differentiating isolated IFG, IGT and DM in subjects with IFG. It cannot be used to identify which subjects with IFG do not require an OGTT.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]