These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of high-performance liquid chromatography and enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique to monitor mycophenolic acid in paediatric renal recipients.
    Author: Irtan S, Azougagh S, Monchaud C, Popon M, Baudouin V, Jacqz-Aigrain E.
    Journal: Pediatr Nephrol; 2008 Oct; 23(10):1859-65. PubMed ID: 18594872.
    Abstract:
    Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is recommended to guide immunosuppression. High-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet (HPLC-UV) or the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT), used to measure mycophenolic acid (MPA) were compared in an exclusive paediatric renal transplant population. Twenty patients were included as part of the pharmacokinetics study of MMF, and 88 additional samples were drawn for TDM. Agreement between HPLC-UV and EMIT was assessed by the Bland-Altman method. With the two methods, pre-dose concentrations were not normally distributed. After logarithmic transformation, their mean was 0.79 +/- 1.16 microg ml(-1) and their mean difference was 0.34 +/- 0.16 microg ml(-1) [95% confidence interval (95%CI 0.30-0.38 microg ml(-1), with antilogarithmic values of these limits of 1.34-1.46 microg ml(-1)). Area under the curve (AUC)(HPLC) and AUC(EMIT) were normally distributed. Their mean was 52.42 +/- 25.91 mg x h/l and their mean difference was 15.22 +/- 8 mg x h/l (95%CI 11.99-18.45 mg x h/l), the Bland-Altman plot showing a bias proportional to the mean. Our data showed the absence of agreement between the HPLC and EMIT methods, with an average positive bias of 15% with the EMIT. Further studies are required to determine which method is best appropriate for TDM of MMF in children.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]