These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Refining the method of therapeutic lung lavage in meconium aspiration syndrome.
    Author: Dargaville PA, Copnell B, Tingay DG, Gordon MJ, Mills JF, Morley CJ.
    Journal: Neonatology; 2008; 94(3):160-3. PubMed ID: 18612212.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Therapeutic lung lavage is an emerging treatment for meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), but the ideal fluid volume and lavage technique remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of suction technique, chest squeeze and aliquot volume on the efficacy of lung lavage in MAS. METHODS: MAS was induced in ventilated 2-week-old piglets using 4 ml/kg of 20% human meconium. Lung lavage with either two 8 ml/kg saline aliquots (n = 5) or a single 15 ml/kg aliquot (n = 6) was performed soon after meconium instillation. Lavage fluid was recovered by three methods performed in sequence: closed suction via a suction adaptor; open suction with the ventilator disconnected, and open suction with manual vibratory chest squeezing. Return fluid was collected separately with each method. Recovery of meconium and lavage fluid was determined and expressed as a proportion of the amount instilled. RESULTS: Closed suction resulted in poor meconium and fluid returns, with recovery of meconium being only 5.2 +/- (SD) 2.5% with 2 x 8 ml/kg lavage and 19 +/- 11% with a single 15 ml/kg aliquot. Chest squeeze during suction increased recovery of both meconium and lavage fluid. Overall recovery of instilled meconium was greater with 15 ml/kg lavage (45 +/- 17%) than with two 8 ml/kg aliquots (24 +/- 4.5%, p = 0.028, repeated-measures ANOVA); the corresponding values for return of lavage fluid were 73 +/- 10 and 49 +/- 13%, respectively (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Open suction, vibratory chest squeezing and an aliquot volume of 15 ml/kg each improve the efficacy of lung lavage in MAS, and merit inclusion in the lavage technique in clinical trials of this therapy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]