These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Is PET-CT suitable for predicting lymph node status for gastric cancer?
    Author: Yang QM, Kawamura T, Itoh H, Bando E, Nemoto M, Akamoto S, Furukawa H, Yonemura Y.
    Journal: Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(82-83):782-5. PubMed ID: 18613454.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND/AIMS: To verify the value of PET-CT for predicting lymph node status of gastric cancer preoperatively. METHODOLOGY: 78 gastric cancer patients accepted PET-CT preoperatively, the results of lymph node status were compared with the postoperative pathology. CT was used as control. RESULTS: The accuracy of PET-CT and CT in N category was 55.1% vs. 54.4%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predicting value (PPV), and negative predicting value (NPV) of PET-CT in predicting position of positive lymph node were 31.0%, 97.2%, 61.5%, 92.9%, and 54.7%, respectively. While for CT, were 60.5%, 83.3%, 70.6%, 82.1%, and 62.5%, respectively. For tier 1 lymph node metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of PET-CT were 31.6%, 95.0%, 64.1%, 85.7%, and 59.4%, respectively. While for CT, were 60.0%, 78.8%, 69.1%, 75.0%, and 65.0%, respectively. The sensitivity of CT was significantly better (p = 0.031). For tier 2 or tier 3 lymph node metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of PET-CT were 12.0%, 98.1%, 70.5%, 75.0%, and 70.3%, respectively. While for CT, were 22.7%, 93.5%, 70.6%, 62.5%, and 71.7%, respectively, without significance. CONCLUSIONS: PET-CT is not sensitive enough to predict the regional lymph node status of gastric cancer preoperatively.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]