These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Energy expenditure of the physical activity across the curriculum intervention.
    Author: Honas JJ, Washburn RA, Smith BK, Greene JL, Donnelly JE.
    Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 Aug; 40(8):1501-5. PubMed ID: 18614939.
    Abstract:
    UNLABELLED: Physical activity is frequently a component of interventions designed to diminish weight gain in children. It is essential to determine whether the energy expenditure (EE) elicited by these interventions is sufficient to reduce the rate of weight gain. PURPOSE: To quantify the EE of the Physical Activity across the Curriculum (PAAC) intervention. This intervention involved two 10-min physically active academic lessons per day, taught by classroom teachers. METHODS: We assessed EE of PAAC in 19 males and 19 females using both an indirect calorimeter (IC) (COSMED K4b(2)) and an accelerometer (ActiGraph) (AC). Independent t-tests were used to evaluate gender differences. Dependent t-tests were used to examine the difference between EE assessed by IC and AC. The agreement between EE measured by IC and estimated by AC was evaluated using a Bland-Altman plot. A Pearson correlation between EE measured by IC and estimated by AC was calculated. RESULTS: There were no significant gender differences for age, BMI, or EE; therefore, analyses by gender were not performed. The mean EE measured by IC was 3.1 +/- 1.0 kcal x min(-1) (3.4 METs). Mean EE estimated by AC (1.8 +/- 0.9 kcal x min(-1)) was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than EE measured by IC (mean underestimation = 1.3 kcal x min(-1)). The Bland-Altman plot suggested increased underestimation with increased levels of EE. The 95% limits of agreement were large (-2.8 to +0.3 kcal x min(-1)). The correlation between EE measured by IC and estimated by AC was r = 0.68 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PAAC elicited a level of EE that may prevent excessive weight gain in children. AC significantly underestimated the EE of PAAC lessons and may not provide useful EE estimates in this context.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]