These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 is the most significant of the usual tissue prognostic factors in node-negative breast ductal adenocarcinoma independent of urokinase-type plasminogen activator.
    Author: Descotes F, Riche B, Saez S, De Laroche G, Datchary J, Roy P, André J, Bobin JY.
    Journal: Clin Breast Cancer; 2008 Apr; 8(2):168-77. PubMed ID: 18621614.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the prognostic significance of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) tissue contents in primary breast adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients from 3 medical centers were included between 1994 and 2001. Biologic factors in tumor extracts were all assayed in the same laboratory. PAI-1 and uPA were treated as continuous or dichotomized variables. Metastasis-free survival analyses were performed using the Cox model and the classification algorithm and regression tree (CART) in the whole population and in the subsets of node-negative (pN0) or positive (pN+) cases. Kaplan curves of metastasis-free survival were designed for different groups in relation to uPA/PAI-1 combinations. Urokinase-type plasminogen activator tumor level appears related to the anatomic degree of extension; conversely, PAI-1 tumor content is independent of tumor size and nodal extension. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, adjusted on usual prognostic factors, the metastasis risk increased with PAI-1 level in all patients (HR [hazard ratio], 3.1; P < .001), in pN0 (HR, 4.3; P < .001), and pN+ patients (HR, 2.3; P = .019). It increased also with uPA in all patients (HR, 2.6; P = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, when both variables were included, PAI-1 remained significant in all patients (HR, 2.4; P = .002) and pN0 patients (HR, 3.2; P = .003) but not uPA. CART analyses confirmed that the best partitioning factor was PAI-1. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence for any additional impact of uPA. PAI-1 is an independent prognostic factor in particular in pN0 breast ductal carcinoma.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]