These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Functional compensative mechanism of upper limb with root avulsion of C(5)-C(6) of brachial plexus after ipsilateral C(7) transfer.
    Author: Song J, Chen L, Gu YD.
    Journal: Chin J Traumatol; 2008 Aug; 11(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 18667121.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the compensative mechanism of no further impairment of the upper limb after ipsilateral C(7) transfer for treatment of root avulsion of C(5)-C(6) of the brachial plexus. METHODS: Sixty Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were randomly divided into a C7-transection group and a control group, 30 rats each. In the C(7)-transection group, the left forelimbs of the animals underwent transection of ipsilateral C(7) nerve root while C(5) and C(6) nerve roots were avulsed. In the control group, the left forelimbs only underwent C(5) and C(6) root avulsion. The representative muscles of C(7) (innervated mainly by C(7)) including latissimus dorsi, triceps, extensor carpi radialis brevis and extensor digitorum communis were evaluated with neurophysiological investigation, muscular histology and motor end plate histomorphometry 3, 6 and 12 weeks after operation. The right forelimbs of all rats were taken as the control sides. RESULTS: Three weeks after operation, the recovery rates of amplitudes of compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and CMAP latency, muscular wet weight and cross-sectional area of muscle fibers, and area of postsynaptic membranes of those four representative muscles in the C(7)-transection group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P less than 0.05 or P less than 0.01). Six weeks postoperatively, the recovery rates of CMAP amplitude and latency of the triceps showed no significant difference between the C(7)-transection group and the control group (P larger than 0.05). For the extensor carpi radialis brevis and the extensor digitorum communis, the recovery rates of the cross-sectional area of muscle fibers, the amplitude and latency of CMAP and the area of postsynaptic membranes showed no significant difference between the two groups (P larger than 0.05), while the rest parameters were still significantly different between the two group (P less than 0.05 or P less than 0.01). As far as the ultramicrostructure was concerned in the C(7)-transection group, more motor end plates of four representative muscles were observed and their ultramicrostructure also had a tendency to mature as compared with those of 3 weeks postoperatively. Twelve weeks after operation, all parameters of the C(7)-transection group were not significantly different from those of the control group (P >0.05). In the C7-transection group, the motor end plates were densely distributed and their ultramicrostructure in four representative muscles appeared to be mature as compared with those of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: After ipsilateral C(7) transfer for treatment of root avulsion of C(5)-C(6) of the brachial plexus, the nerve fibers of the lower trunk can compensatively innervate fibers of C(7)-representative muscles by means of motor end plate regeneration, so there is no further impairment on the injured upper limb.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]