These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Surgery for rheumatic tricuspid valve disease: a 30-year experience.
    Author: Bernal JM, Pontón A, Diaz B, Llorca J, García I, Sarralde A, Diago C, Revuelta JM.
    Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Aug; 136(2):476-81. PubMed ID: 18692660.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess factors influencing short- and long-term outcomes of surgery for rheumatic disease of the tricuspid valve. METHODS: Between 1974 and 2005, a total of 328 consecutive patients (mean age 51.3 +/- 13.6 years) underwent tricuspid valve surgery for rheumatic disease. There were 12 cases of isolated tricuspid lesion, 199 of triple-valve disease, 114 of tricuspid and mitral valve disease, and 3 of aortic and tricuspid valve disease. Most patients (72%) had predominantly tricuspid regurgitation. Tricuspid valve prosthetic replacement was performed in 31 cases and valve repair in 297. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 7.6%. Late mortality was 52.1%, whereas the expected mortality of the Spanish population of the same age was 24.2%. Predictors of in-hospital mortality were male sex, isolated tricuspid lesion, moderate aortic insufficiency, postclamping time, and tricuspid valve replacement. Mean follow-up was 8.7 years (range 1-31 years). Follow-up was 98.9% complete. Predictors of late mortality were age, New York Heart Association functional class IV, postclamping time, and mitral valve replacement. In total, 114 patients required valve reoperation, but only 4 (3.5%) for isolated tricuspid valve dysfunction. At 30 years, actuarial survival was 12.1% +/- 4.4%, actuarial freedom from reoperation was 27.5% +/- 5.8%, and actuarial freedom from valve-related complications was 2.0% +/- 1.3%. CONCLUSION: Organic tricuspid valve disease associated with rheumatic mitral or aortic lesions increases hospital and late mortality, but valve repair compared favorably with valve replacement. Long-term results may be considered acceptable for otherwise incurable valve disease.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]