These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Survival and an overview of decision-making in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. Author: Forsmo HM, Horn A, Viste A, Hoem D, Ovrebo K. Journal: Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2008 Aug; 7(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 18693178. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma is rare, accounting for approximately 3% of all gastrointestinal cancers. This study aimed to identify the survival rate among surgically treated and palliated patients, and secondly to identify parameters that could predict a curative resection. METHODS: A total of 121 patients, 55 men and 66 women, median age 70 years (range 31-91), who had been treated for cholangiocarcinoma in the period of 1990-2005 were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Curative resection was performed in 40 patients (33%), whereas 81 received palliative treatment (67%). 16% (19 of 121) of the patients had an explorative laparotomy without tumour resection. Age above 65 years (OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.4-8.4; P=0.008), weight loss (OR 8.5; 95% CI 1.5-46; P=0.01) or tumour location (The resection rate of hilar cholangiocarcinoma was lower than that of intrapancreatic cancer.) (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.7-4.5; P=0.001) predicted palliative treatment. The adjusted 5-year survival rate of patients who received tumour resection and palliative treatment was 30% and 1.2 %, respectively (P<0.001). The survival rate of patients who were subjected to hepatectomy (70%) was better than that of patients who had a local or distal resection (20%) (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In few patients with a resectable cholangiocarcinoma, an explorative laparotomy is often necessary to evaluate resectability. However, long-term survival is significantly better in patients who received radical surgical resection.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]