These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Endosonography versus computerized tomography in preoperative staging of esophageal cancers]. Author: Heintz A, Höhne U, Schweden F, Junginger T. Journal: Z Gastroenterol; 1991 Feb; 29(2):49-52. PubMed ID: 1871999. Abstract: The results of endosonography and computed tomography--using an optimized technique of CT--in preoperative staging of esophageal cancer are compared. In 22 of 40 patients with esophageal tumors a complete passage by the ultrasonic endoscope was possible. Endosonography was superior to CT in the assessment of early stages of esophageal tumors (T1/T2). Out of nine tumors confined to the esophageal wall, eight were classified correctly by endosonography, only five by computed tomography. The results in T3- and T4-carcinomas (13 patients) were comparable for endosonography and computed tomography. Endosonography is of importance in the selection of patients with early stages of cancer, in whom a curative resectability is still possible.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]