These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Visual outcomes after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis with and without iris registration.
    Author: Tantayakom T, Lim JN, Purcell TL, Nalgirkar A, Cheng L, Schanzlin DJ.
    Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1532-7. PubMed ID: 18721715.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in eyes in which iris registration was used (IR group) and eyes in which iris registration would not engage (no-IR group). SETTING: Shiley Eye Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. METHODS: This retrospective analysis comprised 112 eyes of 64 patients who had wavefront-guided LASIK using the Visx CustomVue S4 IR platform (Advanced Medical Optics) for myopia or myopic astigmatism. The safety, efficacy, predictability, and need for enhancement at the 3-month follow-up were evaluated and compared between the IR group and the no-IR group. RESULTS: By 3 months postoperatively, all eyes in the IR group and 93% of eyes in the no-IR group had the same best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) as preoperatively or had gained 1 to 2 lines of BSCVA. No eye in either group lost more than 1 line of BSCVA (P = 0.12). Ninety-six percent of eyes in the IR group and 93% in the no-IR group were within +/-0.50 diopter (D) of the postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (P = 0.24), and all eyes were within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia. Four eyes in the IR group and 11 in the no-IR group required retreatment during the follow-up period (P = 0.1). CONCLUSION: The results in the IR group and the no-IR group were comparable, with no statistically significant differences in measured outcomes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]